Staff Report #1
November 12, 2018
To All Members of the Accessible Public Transit Service Advisory Committee
Re: Draft 2019 Conventional Service Plan
Recommendations
That the report be NOTED and FILED.
Background
At the April 29, 2015 meeting, the Commission approved the Route Structure and Service Guidelines Review as a framework document for service changes over the five year period covering 2015-2019. When a multi-year plan is prepared, a number of assumptions have to be made with respect to how the various recommended changes in any one year will impact service and ridership. Additionally, the current on-road experience is relied upon as the basis for the recommendations. As each year’s plan is implemented, service realities change, both in response to the service changes as well as conditions outside of the Commission’s control (i.e. traffic congestion, extended periods of construction, ridership response to changes, etc.). 2019 represents the fifth and final year of the five year plan, and as such, variances from the changes originally contemplated for 2019 are expected.
Consistent with past practice, the 2019 draft service planning process takes direction from the recommendations in the report, but also includes assessments pertaining to:
- existing service performance issues and demands
- 12 month assessment of the 2017 service plan changes
- early assessment of the 2018 service plan changes
- new growth areas
- customer requests
- Operator, Inspector and Dispatcher feedback
This report sets out the proposed 2019 service plan recommendations, including discussion related to changes from the Route Structure and Service Guidelines document. Additionally, discussion is provided on the 12 month and two month assessments of the 2017 and 2018 Service plans respectively.
Draft 2019 Service Plan Changes
As 2019 is the fifth and final year of the five year plan, priorities have changed or been adjusted based on previous years changes, current service realities as well as public and Operator feedback. The 2019 draft service plan generally follows the recommendations set out in the five year plan with some additional proposals which are considered priorities based on the current service realities. Similar to the 2018 process, a number of frequency, running time and routing changes were identified as high priority to address current on road concerns. In addition, the 2019 plan builds on the guiding principle of the five year plan of ‘right sizing’ the system by proposing a number of routing modifications to streamline the overall network. The majority of the proposed routing modifications aim to have arterial routes remain along major arteries, while providing local service to the surrounding subdivisions with feeder routes. This will allow for frequencies to better match with the type of service being provided.
The draft 2019 Service Plan sets out the changes that are the highest priority, totalling approximately 24,700 hours on an annual basis and six additional peak period bus requirements. Noting the approved 2019 budget allows for the addition of 17,700 annualized hours and one additional peak period bus, further assessment will be completed to prioritize changes and evaluate tripper vehicle requirements based upon proposed service improvements.
In light of the significant number and scope of changes as well as the interdependency of many of the changes, a table below has been created to assist in the assessment. The right-most column indicates the other routes with changes that are associated with the route being discussed. In cases where there are routes listed in this column, the proposed change can only occur in conjunction with the proposed changes for all routes listed.
Table I – 2019 Draft Service Plan
| Route | Description of Service Change | Annual Service Hours | 2019 Service Hours | Peak Buses | Rationale | Dependant On/Related to Recommended Change for Route(s) |
| 1, 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7/11, 9, 10/14, 12, 13, 15/21, 16, 17, 20, 25 | Extend service until 1am, weekdays and Saturdays | 8,820 | 2,940 | 0 | Extend Span of Service | – |
| 1,3,5,6,7, 11,12,25 |
Extend service earlier on Sunday to start at 7 am instead of 9 am | 1,120 | 370 | 0 | Extend Span of Service | – |
| 4, 10/14, 12, 13, 15/21, 16, 25, 29, 33, 35, 90, 91, 102, 104, 106 | Reduced frequency and/ or reduced span of service | -5,540 | -1,600 | -1 | Right-Size the System | – |
| 2, 4, 13, 91 | Additional buses to improve schedule adherence | 3,600 | 1,200 | 1 | Reduce Late Buses | – |
| 2, 6, 10, 29, 102, 106 | Routing Modification- eliminate service along Oxford Drive at Western University after 7 pm to provide consistent service along Western Road | 0 | 0 | 0 | Simplify the Network | |
| 1 | Routing modifications to operate along Colborne instead of Richmond, modify routing around South St and Grey St, remove service from the Bond and Raywood area.
Minor frequency changes |
-3,690 | -1,230 | -1 | Directness of Travel | – |
| 2 | Reduce weekday peak period frequency from 10 to 15 minutes | -7,308 | -2,436 | -4 | Reduce Travel Time | Route 94 |
| 5 | Routing modification in Byron to provide service along Boler during all time periods | 0 | 0 | 0 | Simplify the Network | – |
| 6 | Routing modification around Western University
Eliminate interline with Route 9C Minor frequency changes |
-1,980 | -660 | -1 | Simplify the Network | Route 9 |
| 6 | Frequency and Travel Time Reductions (spring/ summer only) | -850 | 0 | 0 | Right-Size the System | – |
| 9 | Routing modification in Whitehills
Eliminate interline with Route 6 Increase round trip time |
3,780 | 1,260 | 1 | Simplify the Network and Reduce Late Buses | Route 6 |
| 10 | Routing modification – operate on Wellington instead of Montgomery | 0 | 0 | 0 | Simplify the Network | – |
| 10 | Extend route to Masonville Weekdays between 9am and 2pm | 1,260 | 420 | 0 | Simplify the Network, Address Overcrowding | – |
| 14 | Routing modification to extend service to Kipps Lane | 1,050 | 350 | 1 | Connect Major Nodes | Route 32 |
| 15/21 | Reduce weekday AM Peak frequency from 15 to 16 minutes | 0 | 0 | 0 | Reduce Late Buses | – |
| 16 | Route modification – Remove deviation to Victoria Hospital, remove 16B branch through Summerside, modify the 16A branch; Significant frequency increases | 2,060 | 690 | 1 | Directness of Travel; Right-Size System | Route 24, 92 |
| 19/38/39 | Interline Route 19 with Routes 38/39
Minor span of service and frequency increases |
840 | 280 | 1 | Extend Span of Service; Reduce Late Buses | Route 31 |
| 24 | Route modification – Extend route to serve Summerside; Introduce Sunday service between 10am and 5pm | 2,590 | 860 | 0 | Directness of Travel; Extend Span of Service; Right-Size System | Route 16, 92 |
| 25 | Route modification – operate directly on Fanshawe Park Road | 0 | 0 | 0 | Directness of Travel | Route 40 |
| 25 | Increase Weekday and Sunday afternoon frequency significantly | 1,010 | 340 | 1 | Address overcrowding; Ridership Growth | – |
| 26 | Eliminate Route 26 | -11,150 | -3,720 | -3 | Rename Route | Route 93 |
| 27 | Introduce Sunday Service Increase Spring/ Summer Weekday frequency significantly | 1,350 | 140 | 0 | Extend Span of Service; Address overcrowding | – |
| 27 | Increase Weekday PM Peak Frequency significantly | 340 | 170 | 1 | Attract passengers | – |
| 28 | Route Modification – Connect Lambeth to White Oaks Mall via Exeter, White Oak Road | 0 | 0 | 0 | Industrial Service | – |
| 29 | Increase peak PM frequency significantly (fall/ winter only) | 590 | 295 | 1 | Address overcrowding | – |
| 30 | Introduce two weekday late night trips to accommodate shift times | 340 | 110 | 0 | Industrial Service | – |
| 31/32 | Routing modification – operating directly on Aldersbrook, Sarnia, and Huron
Minor frequency and span of service improvements Remove interline with Route 19 |
-1,050 | -350 | 0 | Directness of Travel | Route 9, 14, 19 & 40 |
| 31/32 | Minor frequency reductions (spring/ summer only) | -340 | 0 | 0 | Right-Size System | – |
| 33 | Routing modification – 2-way service on Proudfoot during all time periods
minor frequency reductions. Increase Weekday AM frequency from 17 minutes to 13 minutes (fall/winter only) |
1,010 | 500 | 0 | Simplify the Network
Address Overcrowding Ridership Growth |
– |
| 34-40 | Routing modification – Extend Route 34 to Sunningdale and Richmond via Plane Tree Drive
Extend Route 40 to Western University via Windermere & Doon interline Routes 34 & 40 during all time periods |
5,040 | 1,680 | 1 | Introduce service to new growth areas | Route 25, 32 |
| 56 | Introduce Community Bus to Base Line/ Berkshire Village Area (one day a week, 4 hours) | 210 | 70 | 0 | Improve transit access | – |
| 92 | Reduce span of service to peak periods
minor frequency decrease |
-4,540 | -1,510 | -1 | Right-Size System | Route 16, 24 |
| 93 | Introduce Local/ Express Route connecting White Oaks Mall to Masonville Place via Wharncliffe Road | 18,570 | 6,190 | 4 | Directness of Travel; Reduce Travel Time | Route 26 |
| 94 | Introduce peak period express route on Dundas & Western/ Wharncliffe | 7,308 | 2,436 | 4 | Reduce Travel Time | Route 2 |
| 106 | Increase weekday AM frequency from 10 to 8 Minutes (fall/ winter only) | 340 | 170 | 0 | Address overcrowding | – |
| Total |
24,780 |
8,935 |
6 |
Community Bus
Currently, London Transit operates a Community Bus route through the Cherryhill, Proudfoot and Wonderland areas which provides direct service between the residential areas and various retail locations throughout the week. This service has been highly successful and continues to grow.
London Transit has received a number of requests to provide a new community bus service in the Westmount area. Based on 2016 census data, this area has one of the largest populations which match the demographic that typically utilize a community bus service. Additionally, service changes in 2018 in this area have resulted in some areas having longer walks to access service.
The draft 2019 Service Plan proposes implementing a community bus service in this area, operating one day a week to start, as was the case in the Cherryhill area. The exact design of the route including the day to operate and the destinations have not been determined at this time as community bus service is most successful when the design is created in consultation with the residents in the area. Through the public consultation process, area residents will be consulted to determine when and where they want to travel in order to provide the most effective service.
Detailed recommendations regarding the community bus service in this area will be provided as part of the final service plan, which is scheduled to be presented to the Commission at the January 2019 meeting.
Naming Convention Changes
In addition to the proposed changes noted above, it is also proposed as part of the draft 2019 Service Plan to change the current naming conventions for interlined routes.
Historically routes were combined (interlined) in order to provide operational efficiency. If one route took slightly longer than the schedule round trip time and another took slightly less, they could be combined and both routes become more efficient. Interlining also allows passengers to complete a trip without having to transfer buses if the routes were separate. When routes would become interlined each route maintained the original route name with the name changing at the common terminus point, i.e. downtown.
While the reason behind interlining is still a valid practice for operational efficiency and limiting passenger transfers, the way interlined routes are named requires a review.
Currently there are 19 routes which are interlined either all the time or during certain periods of the day. This is increasingly causing confusion to passengers, especially in the areas where the route changes names, with regard to which bus to catch.
In order to simplify the system it is proposed that all interlined routes will have a single route number for the entire length of the route. Additionally, as part of the draft 2019 Service Plan proposals, all interlined routes will be interlined throughout all operating periods to avoid any additional confusion with regard to the routing.
Next Steps
London Transit has promoted the draft service plan through on-board notifications, the LTC website, newspaper ads, public information sessions and community associations. An online survey is also available for customers to provide feedback on the proposed changes. Social media messaging will be utilized to inform the public about the draft plan, related public information centres and the online survey.
Eight public information sessions have been scheduled in the affected communities, including two sessions held centrally downtown. Further, the Commission’s annual drop-in sessions are scheduled for November 29, 2018 at the Central Public Library.
The information sessions will take place between November 8 and December 11, 2018, the details of which are set out below.
Central Public Library November 8, 2018
Masonville Place November 13, 2018
Lambeth Community Centre November 14, 2018
Pond Mills Public Library November 22, 2018
Sherwood Public Library November 27, 2018
Central Public Library November 29, 2018*
Byron Public Library December 4, 2018
Jalna Public Library December 6, 2018
Central Public Library December 11, 2018
*Annual Commission Drop-in Session
All of the information sessions will be held from 2 to 4 pm and 6 to 8 pm.
In addition to the formal public information sessions as set out above, Planning staff will be setting up “pop-up” information sessions at key terminals and bus stops throughout the city to provide information about the draft service plan proposed changes and gather feedback from passengers. Information about the sessions will be promoted through London Transit’s social media platforms and website.
Over the next three months, staff will further assess the identified priorities and refine the recommended service changes to be included in the final 2019 Service Plan. As referenced, the final recommendations respecting the 2019 Conventional Service Plan are scheduled to be presented to the Commission for approval at its January 2019 meeting.
Recommended by:
Katie Burns, Director of Planning
Concurred in by:
Kelly S. Paleczny, General Manager